Flying and Remembering: An Interpretation
I wanted to take a
minute to remember the quote at the beginning of Song of Solomon.
“The
fathers may soar
And the children may
know their names”
From the tone and
the words that this quote uses, it seems that if the fathers do soar, their children will know their names, thus implying following in their footsteps. There
are also many different interpretations of “soar” and “names” that could be
applied to all the father child relationships in this book. How does each
specific case apply to this quote?
Let’s start with
Ruth and her father (Dr. Foster):
From society’s point of view, her
father is soaring. He is very wealthy and prestigious, he even gets a street
named after him. His child (Ruth) knows his name very well. She boasts that a
white family and priest respected her because she was her father’s daughter. Another
definition of “soar” that could be used is “soaring in the Heavens” (dead). While
he is “soaring in the Heavens” (dead), Ruth recommends her father’s name to
Milkman when talking about future careers. She wants him to be a doctor, but he
thinks that it would be queer to be called Dr. Dead. She makes it clear that he
could always become Dr. Foster, the name of her father, thus following his
legacy. In this situation, he is being remembered by not only his child but
also his grandchild.
Now with Macon Jr.
and his father (Macon):
The story with Macon was that he was
shot into the air from the fence. Thus, literally soaring into the air. While
telling this story, Macon Jr. says that during his father’s emancipation, the
white man wrote his information wrong resulting in his name being Macon Dead. Macon
Dead kept the name because his wife liked it, saying that it would be a new
beginning. His children, however, don’t know his original name yet they know
his false name very well. With a false definition of soar (not the wealthy
definition but rather the literal definition) we receive a false name. We notice
that his children remember his name when Pilate says that there are only three Deads
alive, with a sense of pride. We also see Macon Jr. remember his father’s name
when he names is one and only son after him (and himself), who all three have
the same name. Macon Jr. also follows in his father’s footsteps when he takes Milkman
to work with him just as Macon had done with him.
And finally, Milkman
and his father (Macon Jr.):
This relationship is arguably the
most complicated. Like with Ruth’s father, Macon Jr. is seen as “soaring” to
society because of his wealth. He has developed a reputation (not necessarily a
good one) by the towns people which was then translated to Milkman. An example
is when the bartender refuses to admit Milkman because of his father, in this
situation, Milkman is being reminded that he is his father’s son. Another
example of when Milkman knows his father’s name is when he claims it. When
Pilate said that there were only three Deads alive, he corrected her, feeling
that he had a position in this secret society, the Dead society. We also see
Milkman follow in his father’s footsteps, working with him and engaging in the
wealthy neighborhood activities.
In all the father child
relationships, we can see how each of them follow the beginning phrase in some
way by using different definitions and interpretations. What do you think of
these conclusions?
This is an interesting connection you make. I think the quote at the beginning is very interesting considering how much we know about the characters now. Song of Solomon seems to be very much defined by generations and their differences/similarities. The relationships between family members are very much the center of this book and its plot, so it makes a lot of sense to interpret the quote at the beginning as the different members of the family and how they interact.
ReplyDeleteI think the whole thing with Dr. Foster is really interesting and I hadn't made that connection before. It also is cool in connection with Ruth's stories about Dr. Foster and Macon II's relationship. Macon II's trying to kill Dr. Foster could be equated (in some twisted way) with him eliminating any chance of Macon III "knowing his name." By doing so, he is ensuring that Macon III will follow in his footsteps with the real estate business instead of being Dr. Dead or Dr. Foster.
ReplyDeleteI also think the double definition of "soar" is very revealing, and it seems unlikely that it is a coincidence that the two main people soaring are Milkman's maternal and paternal grandfathers.
This is interesting. It's easy to forget the epigraph when reading this novel, but this breakdown of this ambiguous statement is revealing. One, I find it interesting the many different ways that "soaring" can be applied to these different situations. Additionally, this shows just how important the "father - child" relationship is in this book into shaping how the characters act and their motives.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Catalin and Albert about the interesting connections the epigraph has to the book. I really do think it is vague and can be taken so many different ways. For example, what if the father could be Milkman in the future? His obsession with flying and his struggle to find an identity could definitely be a parallel to the epigraph. Marvelous work by Morrison for finding an epigraph that seemingly contains the entire plot line.
ReplyDeleteOoh, this is so interesting! There's like, this fundamental contradiction: one one hand, fathers and their children are presented as fundamentally connected. This can be seen in the relationships between all sorts of characters and their fathers (Ruth's, Macon's, Milkman's, Guitar's). But at the same time flight implies independence and freedom, and to Milkman may signify freedom from his father.
ReplyDeleteI think that your quote could also be interpreted as: when the fathers soar (or leave), the children may find out their OWN names. This would make more sense to Milkman. He finds out more about himself once he leaves his father. You made some awesome insights, nice post!
ReplyDeleteInteresting blog post. I think that parents often restrict their children of finding their own identity. They have expectations of their children, which might not be what the child wants to be. I interpret this quote as when the child is finally free from their parents, they can formulate their own person. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI like the way you connected the quote to three different individuals and their perception of, and relationship to, their fathers. But It is also clear that when the ‘soaring’ fathers do not have a good reputation, the children are forced to contemplate their father’s names. I also feel that ‘soaring’ may refer to escaping to freedom like the legendary Solomon had done.
ReplyDelete